Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to. I really don’t think sarcasm is appropriate when talking about serious matters like brain damage. and you think this idiot’s attitude toward substance abuse (to recap: "I am a recreational drug user….") is an more appropriate? I failed to see anything so bizarre about what he wrote. I’m not saying he couldn’t have brain damage, but all he did was use DXM to get high; not an unusual drug these days. It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. What is your deal with detox? Not even all hard-drug users and alcoholics need that. He’s just a tripper. never met one person in a detox who didn’t start out "just tripping." i know lots of kids , as iam a kid, who do hard drugs (coke, H, Oxy) non of them trip.
how can you do coke, heroin, oxy, etc. and not trip? by definition you consciousness is altered. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to. I really don’t think sarcasm is appropriate when talking about serious matters like brain damage. and you think this idiot’s attitude toward substance abuse (to recap: "I am a recreational drug user….") is an more appropriate? I failed to see anything so bizarre about what he wrote. I’m not saying he couldn’t have brain damage, but all he did was use DXM to get high; not an unusual drug these days. It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. What is your deal with detox? Not even all hard-drug users and alcoholics need that. He’s just a tripper. never met one person in a detox who didn’t start out "just tripping." i know lots of kids , as iam a kid, who do hard drugs (coke, H, Oxy) non of them trip. how can you do coke, heroin, oxy, etc. and not trip? by definition you consciousness is altered.
I think you’re dealing with terms of art here. A "trip" is not necessarily the same as a "high"–both are altered consciousness but the details are different. — — –John Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net (used to be jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Response:
It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. What is your deal with detox? Not even all hard-drug users and alcoholics need that. He’s just a tripper. never met one person in a detox who didn’t start out "just tripping." if he doesn’t want to be perceived as a drug abuser, he should think twice about how he presents himself.
You’re projecting your own values onto others. — Joel Crump
Response:
watchin’ you guys argue is quite amusing. =) As far as Olney’s lesions go, I have my doubts as well, at least I don’t think it’s likely. Although I don’t remember much about what they are. However, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that some of my memory problems (and by problems, I don’t mean sever problems, I just forget the details of things very easily, unless I make a point to remember) could be linked to DXM. I could also see them being linked to MDMA, MDEA or ADHD or none of the above. I can’t if my memory was this bada before i did drugs, b/c to be honest I can’t remember (hehe). However, my mother has always told me that I’ve been absent minded my whole life, so who knows. -KoolAid
Response:
let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes
Just because someone uses recreationally does not mean that they will end up in detox. Besides, detox is a 24-hour holding tank for people who are intoxicated and causing a raucus. I believe what you are attempting to refer to is rehab. Given that I have all As going in school (except for 1 B+), and I have noticed no impairment in any of the areas that Olney’s lesions affect, plus the fact that I have done doses 16 times those which I am recommending suggests that Olneys lesions are about as valid for the pattern of usage I’m suggesting as water intoxication. Oh, and since I know how much you’d like to take alt.drugs out of the header so you can all swarm me, I’m reading this topic from there only.
As long as your education or social life isn’t suffering…have fun. I may not be the best role model for younger people, but I’m not the worst either. Throughout school my grades were pour due to my Comorbid ADD. However, my grades did decrease after I started smoking (I got them from my mother). I didn’t inhale though. My mother didn’t notice, because she was too busy with her drinking habit. After a short stint in the hospital…oh yes…for suicide…not drugs, I moved with my dad. A couple of months later, I was a sophmore in high school, I started inhaling…my grades went up….Hell, my grades went up after I started smoking weed. Not regularly mind you. My friends and I thought it was inanely stupid to smoke weed during school…let alone on campus. Then, the summer between my sophmore and junior year came. I smoked a lot of weed. I also tried acid. The grades during my junior year were awful. Of course, my grandpa died, my mom got imprisoned for 10 days and probabtion for 2 years for burglary and menacing (they were trying to get her for 3 counts of attempted murder), and I was beginning to realize that society, life, and school weren’t all they’re cracked up to be. Oh yes, not to mention I have ADD. I haven’t smoked weed in about a year…give or take or acid. I earned my Associates Degree in Computer Technology with a 3.4 gpa. I worked while doing it…though not regularly. Funny that. I held down a job for a year and a half during my junior and senior year in high school. I haven’t held down a job since for longer than 5 months. That was 5 years ago. I have done an extremely small amount of drugs during that 5 years. Actually, come to think of it. I think 5 mo. is the second longest….everything else is about a month or two. What’s funny about that, is I started doing a fair amount of drugs during that 5 month job stint. Hm…..Doing drugs keeps me in a job. Well… Do you see where I’m going with this? You can’t just take one fact when predicting weather or not someone will go to rehab. The effects that drugs had on my life were extrememly minimal in comparison to the effects my life had on my life. My mother is an extremely unstable person, my father isn’t a great support, my 15-yr. old brother has his own problems…I have no other family to speak of. My support is my own. I have plenty of examples of what not to do in my life…becoming an addict or alcoholic is one of them. I’ll use. I’ll enjoy it. I’ll never overuse it. I’ll never go to rehab. I always drive safe when out drinking with friends. I rarely (if ever) make a public nusiance of myself while intoxicated. You could say that I’ll change my mind, or something will happen…or whatever, but don’t. You have no idea what life with my mother is like…Oh…did I mention the fact that I had to put a restraining order on her in the past year, because she attacked me? Guess what? She was sober…that’s the scariest thing of all. I don’t want to be her. I already see parts of her in me….like talking too much. I’ll use. I’ll enjoy it. I’ll never abuse. To…nobody, Keep on those straight A’s…high school is a huge joke and waste of time (except math…I didn’t learn proper grammar until 3 years out of high school…this isn’t a very good example of it, but grammar takes a lot of work), but once you get through it…there’s college. Elizabeth
Response:
PS. To Mark Your site has nothing interesting on any topic having anything to do with neuroscience. Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it.
Response:
let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes Just because someone uses recreationally does not mean that they will end up in detox.
True, but a much higher percentage of those folks will end up in a detox as compared to those who never use drugs recreationally. Besides, detox is a 24-hour holding tank for people who are intoxicated and causing a raucus.
not the detox I worked in. I believe what you are attempting to refer to is rehab.
I usually mean what I say and I meant detox. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
PS. To Mark Your site has nothing interesting on any topic having anything to do with neuroscience. Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it.
my doctorate and license say otherwise. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
PS. To Mark Your site has nothing interesting on any topic having anything to do with neuroscience.
just for the record, where did I say that it did? Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it.
and that is based on less than 3 minutes exposure? Gee, glad you weren’t on the comittee that awarded me the doctorate or gave me a licence to practice or accepted my articles for publication. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
I respond to this whole entire thread. Not just this branch. PS. To Mark Your site has nothing interesting on any topic having anything to do with neuroscience. just for the record, where did I say that it did?
–In response to Joel Crump you said, " It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously. " It was meant to point out a flaw in an argument. Nothing personal. Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. and that is based on less than 3 minutes exposure? Gee, glad you weren’t on the comittee that awarded me the doctorate or gave me a licence to practice or accepted my articles for publication.
There you go assuming again. I’m glad you mentioned your doctorate once again. I hadn’t quite got it the first several times. (If you’re here, because you’re AD/HD, then I understand, but if you’re not….hmm…maybe you should have that looked at
). Like I said. Just because you studied it, doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. Here’s the flaw. You assumed extremely quick that the kid would end up addicted to the drug. Did it ever occur to you to praise him for the strength to overcome peer pressure and other factors that encourage him to abuse? Reward the bad behavior, ignore the good, is the wrong attitude to take towards children…especially children with a mental disorder. What about responding to his straight A’s with a compliment? Did it ever occur to you that his parents are/were addicts or dead? You made the argument that I couldn’t have come to the conclusion that you may not know all that you think you know in "less than 3 minutes". Well, the same applies here. Except, you seemed to have made the assumption in less than the time it takes for you to read the word "drug". I never made the statement that you absolutely do not know what you are talking about, or that you have no understanding of the psychology field. What I am saying is that, like all things, one can never have a complete understanding. You do NOT know EVERYthing about the psychology field, though, you must know a lot to have earned a Doctorate. That statement was a carefully formulated attempt to get a rise out of you, causing you to make another flaw in your argument that I can jump on. I like a good debate.
Again, nothing personal. I just don’t like seeing kids being beat up by adults for making the decisions that they’ve made when they didn’t have good adult guidance BEFORE they made the decicion. Reward the bad, punish the good.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to. I really don’t think sarcasm is appropriate when talking about serious matters like brain damage. and you think this idiot’s attitude toward substance abuse (to recap: "I am a recreational drug user….") is an more appropriate? I failed to see anything so bizarre about what he wrote. I’m not saying he couldn’t have brain damage, but all he did was use DXM to get high; not an unusual drug these days. It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. What is your deal with detox? Not even all hard-drug users and alcoholics need that. He’s just a tripper. never met one person in a detox who didn’t start out "just tripping."
i know lots of kids , as iam a kid, who do hard drugs (coke, H, Oxy) non of them trip. explain to me how they started out tripping, when they jumped right on to the hard drugs. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – if he doesn’t want to be perceived as a drug abuser, he should think twice about how he presents himself. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously. I’m sure that’s true. I don’t make a habit of looking at every web URL I come across, though. — Joel Crump — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I respond to this whole entire thread. Not just this branch. PS. To Mark Your site has nothing interesting on any topic having anything to do with neuroscience. just for the record, where did I say that it did? –In response to Joel Crump you said, " It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously. " It was meant to point out a flaw in an argument. Nothing personal. if it was meant to point out a flaw in an argument, you did not succeed. As you correctly noted, i referred him to my web page as a hint that I take brain damage seriously. That web page makes it perfectly clear that I am a clinical neuropsychologist (with an interest in brain function and brain damage). pure and simple. Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. and that is based on less than 3 minutes exposure? Gee, glad you weren’t on the comittee that awarded me the doctorate or gave me a licence to practice or accepted my articles for publication. There you go assuming again. I’m glad you mentioned your doctorate once again. I hadn’t quite got it the first several times. (If you’re here, because you’re AD/HD, then I understand, but if you’re not….hmm…maybe you should have that looked at
). Like I said. Just because you studied it, doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. Here’s the flaw. You assumed extremely quick that the kid would end up addicted to the drug. no, you are assuming that I am assuming. Did it ever occur to you to praise him for the strength to overcome peer pressure and other factors that encourage him to abuse? he advertises that he currently abuses. ergo, he has not overcome the peer pressure. why would you assume peer pressure makes him to drugs?
Did I say that peer pressure made him do drugs? I said that there was nothing in his statement to defend the assertion that he has overcome peer pressure. Im 15,
gawd, don’t they teach reading in schools nowadays. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I respond to this whole entire thread. Not just this branch. PS. To Mark Your site has nothing interesting on any topic having anything to do with neuroscience. just for the record, where did I say that it did? –In response to Joel Crump you said, " It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously. " It was meant to point out a flaw in an argument. Nothing personal.
if it was meant to point out a flaw in an argument, you did not succeed. As you correctly noted, i referred him to my web page as a hint that I take brain damage seriously. That web page makes it perfectly clear that I am a clinical neuropsychologist (with an interest in brain function and brain damage). pure and simple. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. and that is based on less than 3 minutes exposure? Gee, glad you weren’t on the comittee that awarded me the doctorate or gave me a licence to practice or accepted my articles for publication. There you go assuming again. I’m glad you mentioned your doctorate once again. I hadn’t quite got it the first several times. (If you’re here, because you’re AD/HD, then I understand, but if you’re not….hmm…maybe you should have that looked at
). Like I said. Just because you studied it, doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. Here’s the flaw. You assumed extremely quick that the kid would end up addicted to the drug.
no, you are assuming that I am assuming. Did it ever occur to you to praise him for the strength to overcome peer pressure and other factors that encourage him to abuse?
he advertises that he currently abuses. ergo, he has not overcome the peer pressure. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Reward the bad behavior, ignore the good, is the wrong attitude to take towards children…especially children with a mental disorder. What about responding to his straight A’s with a compliment? Did it ever occur to you that his parents are/were addicts or dead? You made the argument that I couldn’t have come to the conclusion that you may not know all that you think you know in "less than 3 minutes". Well, the same applies here. Except, you seemed to have made the assumption in less than the time it takes for you to read the word "drug". I never made the statement that you absolutely do not know what you are talking about, or that you have no understanding of the psychology field. What I am saying is that, like all things, one can never have a complete understanding. You do NOT know EVERYthing about the psychology field, though, you must know a lot to have earned a Doctorate. That statement was a carefully formulated attempt to get a rise out of you, causing you to make another flaw in your argument that I can jump on. I like a good debate.
no, but the doctorate and the credentials in neuropsych do make me an expert in this field.
Again, nothing personal. I just don’t like seeing kids being beat up by adults for making the decisions that they’ve made when they didn’t have good adult guidance BEFORE they made the decicion. Reward the bad, punish the good.
rewarding the bad is going to increase the probability of the bad occuring. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I respond to this whole entire thread. Not just this branch. PS. To Mark Your site has nothing interesting on any topic having anything to do with neuroscience. just for the record, where did I say that it did? –In response to Joel Crump you said, " It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously. " It was meant to point out a flaw in an argument. Nothing personal. if it was meant to point out a flaw in an argument, you did not succeed. As you correctly noted, i referred him to my web page as a hint that I take brain damage seriously. That web page makes it perfectly clear that I am a clinical neuropsychologist (with an interest in brain function and brain damage). pure and simple. Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. and that is based on less than 3 minutes exposure? Gee, glad you weren’t on the comittee that awarded me the doctorate or gave me a licence to practice or accepted my articles for publication. There you go assuming again. I’m glad you mentioned your doctorate once again. I hadn’t quite got it the first several times. (If you’re here, because you’re AD/HD, then I understand, but if you’re not….hmm…maybe you should have that looked at
). Like I said. Just because you studied it, doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. Here’s the flaw. You assumed extremely quick that the kid would end up addicted to the drug. no, you are assuming that I am assuming. Did it ever occur to you to praise him for the strength to overcome peer pressure and other factors that encourage him to abuse? he advertises that he currently abuses. ergo, he has not overcome the peer pressure.
why would you assume peer pressure makes him to drugs? Im 15, i do a wide range of drugs, all by my self, i seek out the drugs BY MY SELF, i take the drugs BY MY SELF, and i explore new states of mind, BY My SELF, this kid obviously dosnt take dexo because his friends do it, he takes it because it helps him use the creative side of his brain. and maybe he just likes the way it feels when he is high, not the way it makes him seem to other people, shit , if i told a friend i drink a bottle a bottle of Robo to get trip , they would think im crazy, so dont assume all kids that do drugs do them out of peer pressure… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Reward the bad behavior, ignore the good, is the wrong attitude to take towards children…especially children with a mental disorder. What about responding to his straight A’s with a compliment? Did it ever occur to you that his parents are/were addicts or dead? You made the argument that I couldn’t have come to the conclusion that you may not know all that you think you know in "less than 3 minutes". Well, the same applies here. Except, you seemed to have made the assumption in less than the time it takes for you to read the word "drug". I never made the statement that you absolutely do not know what you are talking about, or that you have no understanding of the psychology field. What I am saying is that, like all things, one can never have a complete understanding. You do NOT know EVERYthing about the psychology field, though, you must know a lot to have earned a Doctorate. That statement was a carefully formulated attempt to get a rise out of you, causing you to make another flaw in your argument that I can jump on. I like a good debate. no, but the doctorate and the credentials in neuropsych do make me an expert in this field.
Again, nothing personal. I just don’t like seeing kids being beat up by adults for making the decisions that they’ve made when they didn’t have good adult guidance BEFORE they made the decicion. Reward the bad, punish the good. rewarding the bad is going to increase the probability of the bad occuring. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
I respond to this whole entire thread. Not just this branch. Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. and that is based on less than 3 minutes exposure? Gee, glad you weren’t on the comittee that awarded me the doctorate or gave me a licence to practice or accepted my articles for publication. There you go assuming again. I’m glad you mentioned your doctorate once again. I hadn’t quite got it the first several times. (If you’re here, because you’re AD/HD, then I understand, but if you’re not….hmm…maybe you should have that looked at
). Like I said. Just because you studied it, doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it.
You ought to know that doctorates are awarded only to people who have demonstrated clearly that they have become experts. I won’t go into the detailed definitions of "expert" and "expertise" that are part of the guidelines for the awarding of doctorates, but you can rest assured that by these formal and very demanding definitions of expertise Mark is an expert of internationally recognised academic quality in the topic he studied. If you have what we in the trade refer to as a first class mind it takes roughly a decade to acquire that kind of expertise. I never made the statement that you absolutely do not know what you are talking about, or that you have no understanding of the psychology field. What I am saying is that, like all things, one can never have a complete understanding. You do NOT know EVERYthing about the psychology field, though, you must know a lot to have earned a Doctorate.
Ok, so after first having claimed that Mark wasn’t necessarily an expert, you have now backed off to the much weaker claim that what you really meant was that he doesn’t know *everything* about psychology. Big deal! There is nobody on this entire planet who knows *everything* about psychology. It’s very likely beyond the capability of the human mind, any human mind. That statement was a carefully formulated attempt to get a rise out of you, causing you to make another flaw in your argument that I can jump on. I like a good debate.
Do be careful. So far you’ve dug a hole and fallen in. Do you really want to keep on digging? — School of Artificial Intelligence, Division of Informatics Edinburgh University, 5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/daidb/people/homes/cam/ ] DoD #205
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I respond to this whole entire thread. Not just this branch. Just because you studied it…doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. and that is based on less than 3 minutes exposure? Gee, glad you weren’t on the comittee that awarded me the doctorate or gave me a licence to practice or accepted my articles for publication. There you go assuming again. I’m glad you mentioned your doctorate once again. I hadn’t quite got it the first several times. (If you’re here, because you’re AD/HD, then I understand, but if you’re not….hmm…maybe you should have that looked at
). Like I said. Just because you studied it, doesn’t mean you’re an expert in it. You ought to know that doctorates are awarded only to people who have demonstrated clearly that they have become experts. I won’t go into the detailed definitions of "expert" and "expertise" that are part of the guidelines for the awarding of doctorates, but you can rest assured that by these formal and very demanding definitions of expertise Mark is an expert of internationally recognised academic quality in the topic he studied. If you have what we in the trade refer to as a first class mind it takes roughly a decade to acquire that kind of expertise. I never made the statement that you absolutely do not know what you are talking about, or that you have no understanding of the psychology field. What I am saying is that, like all things, one can never have a complete understanding. You do NOT know EVERYthing about the psychology field, though, you must know a lot to have earned a Doctorate. Ok, so after first having claimed that Mark wasn’t necessarily an expert, you have now backed off to the much weaker claim that what you really meant was that he doesn’t know *everything* about psychology. Big deal! There is nobody on this entire planet who knows *everything* about psychology. It’s very likely beyond the capability of the human mind, any human mind. That statement was a carefully formulated attempt to get a rise out of you, causing you to make another flaw in your argument that I can jump on. I like a good debate. Do be careful. So far you’ve dug a hole and fallen in. Do you really want to keep on digging?
Actually, she makes a good point. For all this Mark character’s doctoral wisdom, he can’t get past his prejudices. — Joel Crump
Response:
x-posted to alt.drugs and alt.support.attn-deficit. I find it relevant to both groups, so please leave the newsgroup line intact. I’m a 150-pound recreational drug user who also has ADD. One of my favorite drugs is dextromethorphan, a dissociative agent better-known as a cough suppressant. I find that methylphenidate (I take Concerta) impairs creativity. I am on 1 36mg Concerta (time-release intact) and 90mg dextromethorphan (3 capfuls from the thing on the top of Robitussin Maximum Strength Cough, filled to the top line). This very low dose of dex doesn’t impair me at all, and makes it easier to be creative while on methylphenidate. Methylphenidate is also good with higher doses of DXM, as it makes the trip clearer for me and, if taken the day after, eliminates the hangover and turns it into more of a ‘afterglow’. I don’t at all recommend this for children, but anyone in high school or older (I’m 15) could probably use a little dex with their ritalin if they have a writing assignment to get done. The best type of cough syrup to buy is Robitussin Maximum Strength Cough. Other kinds have other ingredients which are very bad for you. www.third-plateau.org/medicines/robomax.jpg Since you’re probably not taking it to get high, I would start at 60mg (a capfull filled up to the top line is 30mg), and up the dose until you start to get uncomfortable (or start walking strangely). Don’t do it every day, just when you need to go write a paper or something like that. Do not mention Olney’s Lesions, as I have done high doses (2-4 bottles) of this stuff weekly, and have no detectable brain damage. If anything, it’s made me smarter (I used to have the same opinion about ADD as alexplore has). You’re more likely to fry your brain by drinking water than by doing this. Please do not flame me for recreationally altering my state of consciousness, you are not going to change my mind, so don’t even try. — This post was anonymized at http://www.xganon.com Come visit the newest xganon server http://www.xganon.org providing rights and freedom related news. —
Response:
Do not mention Olney’s Lesions, as I have done high doses (2-4 bottles) of this stuff weekly, and have no detectable brain damage.
I suppose you have given yourself brain scans to verify this too, right? let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
I suppose you have given yourself brain scans to verify this too, right? let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes
Given that I have all As going in school (except for 1 B+), and I have noticed no impairment in any of the areas that Olney’s lesions affect, plus the fact that I have done doses 16 times those which I am recommending suggests that Olneys lesions are about as valid for the pattern of usage I’m suggesting as water intoxication. Oh, and since I know how much you’d like to take alt.drugs out of the header so you can all swarm me, I’m reading this topic from there only. — This post was anonymized at http://www.xganon.com Come visit the newest xganon server http://www.xganon.org providing rights and freedom related news. —
Response:
Do not mention Olney’s Lesions, as I have done high doses (2-4 bottles) of this stuff weekly, and have no detectable brain damage. I suppose you have given yourself brain scans to verify this too, right? let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes
Detoxing from dextromethorphan… hmm. Something tells me you actually believed what your school told you about drugs. — Joel Crump
Response:
Do not mention Olney’s Lesions, as I have done high doses (2-4 bottles) of this stuff weekly, and have no detectable brain damage. I suppose you have given yourself brain scans to verify this too, right? let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes Detoxing from dextromethorphan… hmm. Something tells me you actually believed what your school told you about drugs.
nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
Do not mention Olney’s Lesions, as I have done high doses (2-4 bottles) of this stuff weekly, and have no detectable brain damage. I suppose you have given yourself brain scans to verify this too, right? let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes Detoxing from dextromethorphan… hmm. Something tells me you actually believed what your school told you about drugs. nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to.
I really don’t think sarcasm is appropriate when talking about serious matters like brain damage. — Joel Crump
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Do not mention Olney’s Lesions, as I have done high doses (2-4 bottles) of this stuff weekly, and have no detectable brain damage. I suppose you have given yourself brain scans to verify this too, right? let me know if you want the names of some good detoxes Detoxing from dextromethorphan… hmm. Something tells me you actually believed what your school told you about drugs. nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to. I really don’t think sarcasm is appropriate when talking about serious matters like brain damage. — Joel Crump
and you think this idiot’s attitude toward substance abuse (to recap: "I am a recreational drug user….") is an more appropriate? It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously. — Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response:
nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to. I really don’t think sarcasm is appropriate when talking about serious matters like brain damage. and you think this idiot’s attitude toward substance abuse (to recap: "I am a recreational drug user….") is an more appropriate?
I failed to see anything so bizarre about what he wrote. I’m not saying he couldn’t have brain damage, but all he did was use DXM to get high; not an unusual drug these days. It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox.
What is your deal with detox? Not even all hard-drug users and alcoholics need that. He’s just a tripper. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously.
I’m sure that’s true. I don’t make a habit of looking at every web URL I come across, though. — Joel Crump
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – nope. it was a line in the first paragraph he wrote that I was reacting to. I really don’t think sarcasm is appropriate when talking about serious matters like brain damage. and you think this idiot’s attitude toward substance abuse (to recap: "I am a recreational drug user….") is an more appropriate? I failed to see anything so bizarre about what he wrote. I’m not saying he couldn’t have brain damage, but all he did was use DXM to get high; not an unusual drug these days. It’s that attitude, not the substance he’s using or not using now that’s going to get him into a detox. What is your deal with detox? Not even all hard-drug users and alcoholics need that. He’s just a tripper.
never met one person in a detox who didn’t start out "just tripping." if he doesn’t want to be perceived as a drug abuser, he should think twice about how he presents himself. And had you looked at my webpage, you should have had a clue that I take brain damage more than seriously. I’m sure that’s true. I don’t make a habit of looking at every web URL I come across, though. — Joel Crump
– Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within reach of every hand. Mother Teresa http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm for mail remove PETERHOOD69
Response: