Question:
Apologies if this is not the right group… Could some kind person explain to me what the meaning to a lay person is of the diagnosis Disassociated Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. Thank you. Kristin — Kristin Rachael Hayward http://130.111.120.13/~hayward
Response:
Apologies if this is not the right group…
This is the right group. Could some kind person explain to me what the meaning to a lay person is of the diagnosis Disassociated Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified.
It means that you fall into the humongous huge giant category of people who have a dissociative disorder *of some type*. There are a variety of dissociative disorders that seem to be too closely aligned for pshrinks to catalogue them seperately. DDNOS is not a diagnosis that tells you anything other than just that you have a dissociativeness ( thats the first d in dd )which is causing you problems (disorder, which is the last d in dd) and that the pshrink or therp who made the diagnosis of a DD isn’t quite sure of what specific form of dd you have ( which is the nos in ddnos ). The commonly accepted definitions of dissociative disorders and the various known attributes of said disorders and tendencies is in the asdis FAQ ( Frequently Asked Questions ) and is long and detailed and will perhaps leave you with more questions than it answers. If you give more info perhaps someone can give you more. Thank you.
Sure. Kristin — Kristin Rachael Hayward http://130.111.120.13/~hayward
Nation of Jackie this account borrowed from jcash
Response:
[...] If the FAQ is on a web site, can someone point the direction.
if you do a web search with *any* search engine for alt.support.dissociation, you will pull up about 1000 copies of the FAQ. it comes in 4 parts, so look for all 4. they are convienently labelled parts one, two, three, and four :) astri #AKA pink bunnies# `o’_* |/(((( |/ All conditions are temporary — For more information about this service, send e-mail to:
Response:
: : :Could some kind person explain to me what the meaning to a lay person :is of the diagnosis Disassociated Personality Disorder Not Otherwise :Specified. : : It means that you fall into the humongous huge giant category of :people who have a dissociative disorder *of some type*. There are a (lots of good stuff snipped) : : The commonly accepted definitions of dissociative disorders and the :various known attributes of said disorders and tendencies is in the :asdis FAQ ( Frequently Asked Questions ) and is long and detailed and :will perhaps leave you with more questions than it answers. If you :give more info perhaps someone can give you more. :Nation of Jackie :this account borrowed from jcash : Yes, whatever it is, I have it bad. Two weeks in Friend’s psychiartic hospital in Phiadelphia, an attempted return to work, now on disability.
If the FAQ is on a web site, can someone point the direction. If not, and someone has archived it, could someone mail it to me. Otherwise I will wait for its (I assume) monthly posting as they do in other groups. Again, thanks.. Kristin — Kristin Rachael Hayward http://130.111.120.13/~hayward
Response:
: :[...] : If the FAQ is on a web site, can someone point the direction. : :if you do a web search with *any* search engine for :alt.support.dissociation, you will pull up about 1000 copies of the FAQ. :it comes in 4 parts, so look for all 4. they are convienently labelled :parts one, two, three, and four :) : : astri #AKA pink bunnies# : `o’_* Yup, should have tried that. AZ gives me 300 references. Thanks. Kristin — Kristin Rachael Hayward http://130.111.120.13/~hayward
Response:
This post is out of order, I know. My comment is here, the original post is in the middle, and Pope C’s most excellent response is at the end. Hi Pope C! You’ve hit this reply right on the mark! The only thing I want to add is that usually we’re a group of people who are extremely intelligent, resourceful, adaptable and creative! Likely to do extremely well in an academic settings, getting into RL with the issues it brings is a bit of a different story. I wanted reply to you about what you wrote about going to therapy with your SO. I think it’s good for both of you, and it was a good present to get. The understanding, the REAL understanding of a SO of us dissoids is very important I think. My SO was reluctant to go to counseling with me. MY SO’s reply was "which one of you would be going to counseling with me anyone?" Ouch! My SO figured that when we settled down into one, and were totally 100% firmly integrated then marital counseling might be in order. I explained to SO that HIS present behavior, attitudes, etc. have alot to do with how my therapy progresses at the moment. I do mange to have him somewhat convinced, and have scheduled joint counseling with a husband & wife couples counseling therapists the SO and the other self went to. I was "gone" for 18 years 10 1/2 months and that makes me mad, but as therp says "at least you have the memories" yet some are very fuzzy. I switch, but this main part (me here) was left out of the rotation for that time. Therp says I was stuck in a dissociation. Yeah, left out of my own life! My therp says that if I had no knowledge of the time I was gone, I would be one step below multiple. Because I do have knowledge of the time I was gone(I recognized the RL children the other self gave birth to, yet didn’t have the bodily knowledge or experience how to drive a car), he considers me to be two steps below true multiplicity. And my being DDNOS, I seem to be in many ways alot like you, the other parts who were not out at therapy would at least have listened to what went on, and try to apply that new knowledge to themselves when they come out. Do you know what I mean? My therp says that I’m not that bad, but being like this isn’t too great either! This type of DDNOS I guess isn’t so bad for a therapist that’s had experience working with full blown polyfragmented DID, but involved enough to scare off your average family therapist that’s astute enough to realize he’s got a highly dissociative person as a client. My therp said not to go around advertising this, and not to write it down anywhere either. Definitely not something to put down on a job resume. Just thoughts! Nice to touch base with you again Pope C! Hope and Peace, Crackers – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Newsgroups: alt.support.dissociation (posted/mailed) : Apologies if this is not the right group… This is definitely the place for that question. : Could some kind person explain to me what the meaning to a lay person : is of the diagnosis Disassociated Personality Disorder Not Otherwise : Specified. Hi, Kristin! DDNOS could cover a whole range of things. Officially DDNOS means that someone has been diagnosed as definitely having some sort of dissociation-related condition, but one which doesn’t fit into the neat pigeon-hole categories the insurance industry and psychologists have defined in the DSM-IV (Diagnostic Standards Manual, 4th edition). Some of those other categories are Dissociative Amnesia, Dissociative Fugue (both fairly rare, I think) and one you’ll hear talked about here a lot: Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) or as my friend ceej says "DID, formerly Multiple Personality Disorder, now under *Entirely New Management*" In theory, DDNOS is a catch-all. There are a bunch of independent groups of symptoms listed which can trigger a DDNOS diagnosis, including a pervasive sense of unreality, or of not being a person. However… in practice, what DDNOS *most* often seems to mean is that someone has some of the indicators for DID, aka "multiple personalities", but is missing some of the key diagnostic criteria, especially memory loss or rigid barriers between "identities". For instance, I sometimes switch into very pronouncedly different patterns of behavior, thought, and perception, especially when I’m by myself. I may also have different parts of me talking or arguing inside my head at one time, even when it’s "me" in control or "in front" as normal. If (for example) in my normal state I didn’t remember what I’d done when one of these other states or identities is "in front", I’d probably be classified as DID. As I do remember what I say or do (though it’s occasionally fuzzy) and I am able to recognize that these others are part of me – I don’t feel we’re totally separated – I have an official diagnosis of DDNOS. Lots of people here have a similar diagnosis of DDNOS on a similar basis. It gets confusing, because once someone gets diagnosed as DID, *this* is the state they’re typically trying to work towards at first – gradually becoming able to communicate with each other inside and cooperate, being able to remember what the others do, be conscious when others are "in control" ("copresent") and be aware of each others’ thoughts ("coconscious".) However, if someone starts with a diagnosis of DID, the psychs tend to stick with it for someone who’s progressed to this state – if you start off from this state, as I seem to have, you’re more likely to be diagnosed DDNOS. I’m now inclined to perceive myself as simply "multiple", because it’s more descriptive, and obviates some of the confusing distinctions between DID and DDNOS. How I experience certain things (e.g. "switching") is very similar to DID folks I’ve talked to here. Hope this helps. — C — Pope C the Anonymous "The road to hell gets a total resurfacing…" — Jim Woodring anonymized]
– For more information about this service, send e-mail to:
Response: